![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
20 Most Recent |
User Comments Post a Comment about this article LN and the fuckers who support itPosted by: SlackerPrince on 12/30/2003 2:22:58 PM I'm with you on punching the notes support operators in the mouth. We have two of them at my location and their answer to everything is to refresh and replace the database design from the server. Never mind that the shitty roll out and implementation caused half of these problems in the first place, or that the other half of the problems are caused because LN agents don't get installed properly. Oh no, refresh and replace will solve everything. They are also the kind of support pricks who never call the user back about an issue assigned to them. So instead the user calls back 1st level support (me), and starts bitching about how they didn't get any more info on the issue. 75% of the time the fix didn't even work and we have to send a new ticket. Plus they won't take tickets unless they are documented to a "t" with all of the user's info. Like it would break their fucking back to look up their info in the address book. But the piece de resistance is the LN unread mail bug. That's right folks, LN sometimes has a "hiccup" on a domino server and all of your mail from the last week/month/year becomes unread! Whee! But the best part? Lotus Notes Developer Domain lists the problem as a known issue currently under investigation, and has said this for the past 6 months I've been here. Translation: we know about the problem but we could give a shit less about the bug in the software, so we're labelling it as a "known issue." Fan-fucking-tastic. How funny that you'd mention Apple... Posted by: SpoonMan on 8/14/2003 3:05:56 PM As they're the ones who pioneered the concept of a "Consistent User Interface". :) Of course, Apple products follow those standards about as well as Lotus does, but hey, whatcha gonna do? As to standards making it more likely that people will use MS products, I would disagree. In fact, I would argue that it has the opposite effect. If I can do the exact same task in the exact same manner with a different program, then it doesn't matter what I use to do it, now does it? It comes down to this: users are stupid. They don't take the time to learn the software that they're supposed to use everyday (worse are the ones who don't even bother to learn the software that they INSIST on having, despite it being outside corporate standards). Having to learn how to create a file in 15 different programs is made easier on their poor, small little minds if it's done the same way on each. It also decreases the learning curve. Once you learned how to use Word, it was easier for you to learn Excel, PowerPoint, etc becuase they all worked the same. The basics follow from app to app, only the stuff that's specific to that app differs. hmmmm ... Posted by: annatorious on 8/14/2003 10:26:09 AM I used LotusNotes 4.6 back at Pee Spray boats (I think having mentioned that I worked at Sea Ray at least a cupla times, I'll move on to a better moniker). I really didn't mind using it. When I came here, and I heard several folks bitching about it, I wondered if they had used an earlier version, or if it had become fucked over in a later version ... But with this story, I remember all those things you just mentioned. I guess it didn't bother me at the time because, although I'm addicted to using hotkeys, I wasn't acclimated to another e-mail program before this. I've also worked in several applications that had completely archane hotkey menus, so this was just one more language to learn. See, it's awful nice that MegalomaniacalSoft standardizes a lot of their hotkeys (such as F5 = refresh), but other software co.s have no real obligation to conform to them. In fact, by subserviating themselves to the MS order, they lessen user's perceptions that there's any point to using something non-MS anyway. Don't get me wrong - I use Windows, I'm a certified MOS in Word, Excel and Powerpoint (whoopty-doo), I almost got certified in Outlook and Access (and I may rant about it someday, except it's not worth it), and I surf using IE. But I don't like the thought of competition being strangled into emulating MS. We need our alternatives, if only for the sake of our free market. I guess I'm also just trying to make myself feel better because I'm supposed to be learning to use a Mac PowerBook G4, and so the "fn," "option" and apple keys are totally fuckin' with me. Yeah, it'll be a filbert on my resume to learn graphics programs, but is it worth it? I dunno ... |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||